X-Received: by 10.107.11.104 with SMTP id v101mr5667909ioi.13.1458830236219; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.50.36.68 with SMTP id o4mr479923igj.1.1458830236196; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path: csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nt3no4139697igb.0!news-out.google.com!pn7ni16742igb.0!nntp.google.com!nt3no4139695igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 07:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8737rgnepk.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=59.88.165.124; posting-account=mBpa7woAAAAGLEWUUKpmbxm-Quu5D8ui
NNTP-Posting-Host: 59.88.165.124
References: <mailman.8.1457732171.12893.python-list@python.org> <8737rvxs89.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <nc2a7s$6dv$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.48.1457831488.12893.python-list@python.org> <nc4ffn$f6s$1@dont-email.me> <56e7483d$0$1608$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <nc7kjr$jj8$1@dont-email.me> <ncnhp9$tt7$1@dont-email.me> <ncnip4$1pb$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.422.1458524141.12893.python-list@python.org> <ncnkma$d1i$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.425.1458526280.12893.python-list@python.org> <56ef9787$0$1516$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.433.1458546438.12893.python-list@python.org> <56f02196$0$1588$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <mailman.29.1458713374.2244.python-list@python.org> <nctrak$rbh$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.45.1458730161.2244.python-list@python.org> <ncu691$4aq$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.78.1458789868.2244.python-list@python.org> <nd0oaa$rsb$1@dont-email.me> <8737rgnepk.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <aae26857-9ef5-41e7-b552-3163cb28cc87@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: The Cost of Dynamism (was Re: Pyhon 2.x or 3.x, which is faster?)
From: Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:37:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Received-Bytes: 2716
X-Received-Body-CRC: 703523748
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:105620

On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 7:46:55 PM UTC+5:30, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> BartC :
> 
> > And forgetting Python for a minute and concentrating only on its
> > byte-code as a language in its own right, how would you go about the
> > job of streamlining it?

> Really, your optimization efforts should concentrate not on bytecode but
> on runtime data structures, algorithms, heuristics, equivalence
> transformations, reachability analysis, profiling and such.

'A' is a scientific programmer; he optimizes his scientific programs
'C' is a financial programmer; he optimizes his finance programs
'B(art)' is a bytecode-interpreter programmer; How does he optimize his bytecode
interpreters?