Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Gregory Ewing Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Equivalent code to the bool() built-in function Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:22:52 +1200 Lines: 10 Message-ID: <9142usF51iU2@mid.individual.net> References: <4da9fb0b$0$13696$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <87k4etho6e.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <4DAB97FD.20103@ieee.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net k4lvmgCt9k305bFwUjQUWQ7K7SuRtjo1e0S2m2GQq1KtS0/OcC Cancel-Lock: sha1:UBws9U7P6Wpt+qyjMqvqAsM85rQ= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Macintosh/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:3512 Chris Angelico wrote: > Remind me some day to finish work on my "ultimate programming > language", which starts out with a clean slate and lets the programmer > define his own operators and everything. Didn't someone already do that and call it "lisp"? :-) -- Greg