X-Received: by 10.31.49.6 with SMTP id x6mr4788311vkx.0.1446702870085; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 21:54:30 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.50.25.131 with SMTP id c3mr17544igg.6.1446702870051; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 21:54:30 -0800 (PST) Path: csiph.com!au2pb.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!c107no5205491qgd.1!news-out.google.com!z4ni46990ign.0!nntp.google.com!i2no4496550igv.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 21:54:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <563abe6f$0$1614$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.183.81.59; posting-account=h7ZmAgoAAAChnNHfIDF1M6YGHuonryl5 NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.183.81.59 References: <662g3blobme52hfoududj27err185v2npm@4ax.com> <56398006$0$11100$c3e8da3@news.astraweb.com> <89a2a4a7-f483-4e94-9f68-ba77ce4b7598@googlegroups.com> <74351250-2c5b-439d-abc9-65e3480cd930@googlegroups.com> <563abe6f$0$1614$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <8d2e4d8d-dead-4ffd-b6fd-00d16cd0c26c@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Regular expressions From: rurpy@yahoo.com Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 05:54:30 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 2239 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1097592243 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:98280 On Wednesday, November 4, 2015 at 7:31:34 PM UTC-7, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2015 11:13 am, rurpy wrote: > > > There would be far fewer computer languages, and they would be much > > more primitive if regular expressions (and the fundamental concepts > > that they express) did not exist. > > Well, that's certainly true. But only because contra-factual statements can > imply the truth of anything. If squares had seven sides, then Joseph Stalin > would have been the first woman to go to the moon on horseback. Yes, thank you for that profoundly insightful comment.