Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Learning new languages (was: checking if a list is empty)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 06:37:50 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <87vcxgoagh.fsf_-_@mithlond.arda>
References: <BANLkTikF18n2dBU6hhFngcAPkE2ZpErVAw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimWdAijp6vWm9sC_9rFMgpoRf35Hg@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1260.1304710333.9059.python-list@python.org> <9hYwp.5805$xo2.3333@newsfe07.iad> <4dc502c7$0$29991$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <Aqoxp.67882$7N3.65130@newsfe10.iad> <mailman.1302.1304830690.9059.python-list@python.org> <e36q98-796.ln1@svn.schaathun.net> <4dca9310$0$29980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <kcjq98-9l6.ln1@svn.schaathun.net> <4dcab8bf$0$29980$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <bovq98-2v6.ln1@svn.schaathun.net> <mailman.1426.1305141260.9059.python-list@python.org> <og4r98-k87.ln1@svn.schaathun.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="TcTTtsh3Iz4M1vNcTNIcFQ"; logging-data="28068"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VBpUoGU2+MOtvEQgyHt7FVcm2N+A32k8="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:j21qCKKo0uDHM2Qk35P48F0r8hY= sha1:TY1Ej1CYf2nqvYowviknU9XmrMQ=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:5186

* 2011-05-11T20:26:48+01:00 * Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:

> On Wed, 11 May 2011 14:44:37 -0400, Prasad, Ramit
>   <ramit.prasad@jpmchase.com> wrote:
>> I claim to be able to program (Java/Python), but would be absolutely
>> lost programming in Lisp. It is more than just "learning the syntax",
>> it includes a thought paradigm as well.
>
> OK. I should written 'how to program imperatively' ... 'new imperative
> language'. Or substitute functional/logical/whatever for imperative.

Common Lisp is an imperative language. It is also functional and
object-oriented language. It does not force any paradigm but supports
many. Thus, it is called a multi-paradigm language. I understand that
Lisp can be scary, though. Lisp code looks weird and it seems that the
myth that it's a functional language can't be busted.

Anyway, I agree with this:

    * 2011-05-11T19:05:31+01:00 * Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
    > Someone who knows how to program is never clueless starting a new
    > language. Newbie, may be, but he knows most of the constructions
    > and semantic principles to look for; most of it is learning the
    > syntax.