Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: better and user friendly IDE recommended?
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 16:47:26 +0100
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <87vc26oxdd.fsf@no-fixed-abode.cable.virginmedia.net>
References: <091bbe36-8cf9-412f-b7e9-2b3cc89dd363@googlegroups.com> <7wppse2aak.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mailman.301.1378969815.5461.python-list@python.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: individual.net eoCrITfvpBAfqke7HsAV2AWo4UPsei4+SENaJh9p+cz/mfdL4E
X-Orig-Path: hal9000.rudin.co.uk!not-for-mail
Cancel-Lock: sha1:F0Wo2lyQKFw39SpJGNBdqYB+IYI= sha1:ljaJ97CShqjwRGeCZkJtfY9kAz4=
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux)
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:54058

Joshua Landau <joshua@landau.ws> writes:

> If the time learning a set of tools is enough to make the choice
> between tools, I suggest avoiding, say, Vim.

That's a big if. 

If you expect to spend a lot of time editing text, code, etc. over the
next few years then it's definitely learning at least one of vim or
emacs to a reasonable degree of competency.