Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marko Rauhamaa Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Continuing indentation Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 18:47:41 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 32 Message-ID: <87vb53se36.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> References: <8760x4bo5h.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <871t7sbkex.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b7cb1518d23ec19d482dcc9c31d30fdd"; logging-data="12767"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19iVaj4Mt9G2QgM+hhF7X1w" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cv1LBrhVj4PiP4j5w2zogbxYEGE= sha1:HjPVZ7ViQMiOI741ylwq59Vwrt0= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:103978 John Gordon : > In <871t7sbkex.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> Marko Rauhamaa > writes: > >> Ethan Furman : > >> > No, it isn't. Using '\' for line continuation is strongly discouraged. > >> Why would you discourage valid syntax? > > Some things that are permissible may not be desirable. Line continuations are such a central part of the syntax that it would seem silly to deprecate them. While it is true that if a and \ b: pass is ugly, if (a and b): pass is even uglier. Marko