Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Explanation of this Python language feature? [x for x in x for x in x] (to flatten a nested list)
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2014 23:10:47 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <87txa643so.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
References: <9daf0806-02de-4447-964c-c8f8953c23e5@googlegroups.com> <lgtsga$2ei$1@dont-email.me> <lh1h1f$ov3$1@speranza.aioe.org> <5334c38e$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <lh4ouu$n8l$1@speranza.aioe.org> <53364327$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <lh5iqs$j0m$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mailman.8683.1396069736.18130.python-list@python.org> <53365F55.2040302@gmail.com> <mailman.8688.1396073027.18130.python-list@python.org> <lh5vq3$c1j$1@speranza.aioe.org> <533836c4$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <lhb0on$pcj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <op.xdltbjr05079vu@gnudebeest> <lhfatq$hrj$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mailman.8830.1396532123.18130.python-list@python.org> <lhk2pi$nnf$1@speranza.aioe.org> <533e811a$0$29993$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <lhqmvk$paq$1@speranza.aioe.org> <874n26su9f.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <53418644$0$29993$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ff5cf27ef3d5b31f034d3b72bdc27a41"; logging-data="29820"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18h9cNeyi02Sd53EZLQl/Nn"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wfgFh5GkrdMWJ1nmvzTBRpVgPOM= sha1:/KHj9/6BSCVGuurvbuXiDKL2OCM=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:69780

Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info>:

> On Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:05:16 +0300, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>> Python, BTW, is perfectly suitable for computer science. 
>
> I don't think it is. Python is not a pure functional language, so it's 
> very difficult to prove anything about the code apart from running it. 

Many classic CS ideas are expressed in terms of an Algol-like language.
Nothing would prevent you from framing those ideas in a Python-like
(pseudo)language. The question is mostly whether you prefer begin/end,
braces or indentation.

>>  * combinatory birds in forests
>
> I don't believe that came from academia. If I've understood correctly, 
> that was from a non-academic book on applying the lambda calculus to 
> solve practical applications.

It is academic because the author, Raymond Smullyan, was a professor of
philosophy and, more importantly, my professor selected that as a
textbook for us graduate students.


Marko