Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: What does a list comprehension do
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:36:33 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 50
Message-ID: <87k2p43h8e.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net>
References: <CAPTjJmpwjWnF=d6mpgbKS1biVLoR4APutgyH0n9t6CJ=Kh4dCg@mail.gmail.com> <877fldnm9z.fsf@handshake.de> <mailman.73.1448459485.20593.python-list@python.org> <pan.2015.11.26.11.13.43.440000@nowhere.invalid> <mailman.132.1448538769.20593.python-list@python.org> <87k2p4ex5x.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.138.1448544914.20593.python-list@python.org> <87fuzseuee.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <mailman.141.1448548095.20593.python-list@python.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b7cb1518d23ec19d482dcc9c31d30fdd"; logging-data="8252"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18PTXmvW+e6cCqgrIuoClIF"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9wS/oUzmxgH+i/I+M6m6oyJnWnc= sha1:uVQYnyzGtZ8xLEJx+hSmOHIK/6c=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:99583

Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be>:

>     [ <expression> for <var> in <iter> ]
>
> would implicitly be rewritten as follows:
>
>     [ (lambda <var>: <expression>)(<var>) for <var> in <iter>]

Funny enough, that's how "list comprehensions" are created in Scheme:

   (map (lambda (i)
          (lambda (x) (* i x)))
        '(0 1 2 3))))

> There would no change on how lambdas work or functions or closures.

First of all, it's weird to spend any effort in trying to alter a very
special case. I don't recall having to generate a list of such
functions. In fact, I barely ever use lambda in Python; explicit def
statements are much more pleasing to the eye and are not restricted to
simple expressions.

Secondly, you'd lose the nice symmetry between for statements and
comprehensions/generators. For example:

   ( lambda x: i * x for i in range(4) )

corresponds to:

    for i in range(4):
        yield lambda x: i * x

Would you embed an extra lambda there, too?

How about:

    i = 0
    while i < 4:
        yield lambda x: i * x
        i += 1

or:

    for i in range(4):
        def f(x):
            return i * x
        yield f


Marko