Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!storethat.news.telefonica.de!telefonica.de!news.panservice.it!feed.xsnews.nl!border02.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder04.ams.xsnews.nl!abp001.ams.xsnews.nl!frontend-F09-16.ams.news.kpn.nl From: Cecil Westerhof Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: To pickle or not to pickle Organization: Decebal Computing References: <87h9rnz8yy.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> X-Face: "(y8cC@tg_12{">GF'UXTW]FHI2wMiZNrnf'1EFQ&O#$m:f#O7+7}kR,v+Pti8=Vi/Z"g^?b"E X-Homepage: http://www.decebal.nl/ Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 13:51:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87d22bz3q9.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:76w2xF617LnKejTqeTkeAuPz8o0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 25 NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.207.62.244 X-Trace: 1431086406 news.kpn.nl 18987 81.207.62.244@kpn/81.207.62.244:40037 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:90157 Op Friday 8 May 2015 12:32 CEST schreef Peter Otten: > Cecil Westerhof wrote: > >> I first used marshal in my filebasedMessages module. Then I read >> that you should not use it, because it changes per Python version >> and it was better to use pickle. So I did that and now I find: >> https://wiki.python.org/moin/Pickle >> >> Is it really that bad and should I change again? > > Let's say it the other way around: pickle is fine for short term > storage when the generation of the file is under your control and > you only need to access it from Python. > > Does that description fit your requirements? Certainly. I use it to store which messages are ‘recently’ used, so I will not use them for the next. I will keep it like this for the moment being then. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof