Path: csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marko Rauhamaa Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Late-binding of function defaults (was Re: What is a function parameter =[] for?) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 23:00:55 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 14 Message-ID: <877fl56bg8.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> References: <87d1v5emhl.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <564e6a62$0$1620$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <565592e9$0$1615$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <201511251559.tAPFxVm6020346@fido.openend.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b7cb1518d23ec19d482dcc9c31d30fdd"; logging-data="19930"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cvY/we9l8zs1mtCUBdgki" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:6LHK3qr3k14RfAPNxhymURWgWdI= sha1:bedfV5GnU9C5lkc/1JYYrW2d92I= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:99489 Ben Finney : > Perhaps it would be easier if you point out that ‘x’ doesn't mean > multiply either, and they've *already* been substituting that symbol > instead of the correct ‘×’ for multiply. In my childhood, we always used '·' for the multiplication sign until senior high school, when the vector product was introduced. I seem to recall ‘×’ was used in cartesian products already in junior high. Marko