Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #8058

Re: Do we still need to inherit from "object" to create new-style classes?

Show all headers | View raw

John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> writes:

> I can't quite seem to find the answer to this anywhere. The book I'm
> reading right now was written for Python 3.1 and doesn't use (object),
> so I'm thinking that was just a way to force new-style classes in 2.x
> and is no longer necessary in 3.x. Is that right?

Not as far as I know. Python 2.x classes will not inherit from anything
unless you make them do so explicitly.

-- 
 \      “People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of |
  `\   thought which they avoid.” —Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813–1855) |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Do we still need to inherit from "object" to create new-style classes? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 18:26 -0700
  Re: Do we still need to inherit from "object" to create new-style classes? Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-06-20 18:33 -0700
    Re: Do we still need to inherit from "object" to create new-style classes? John Salerno <johnjsal@gmail.com> - 2011-06-20 19:13 -0700
  Re: Do we still need to inherit from "object" to create new-style classes? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-06-21 12:41 +1000
  Re: Do we still need to inherit from "object" to create new-style classes? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-21 13:30 -0400

csiph-web