Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Why not allow empty code blocks? Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 17:55:57 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <874m7571eq.fsf@jester.gateway.pace.com> References: <579B1ABB.1070500@rece.vub.ac.be> <579c2095$0$22142$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <579ca644$0$1589$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <579ccc68$0$1583$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <579d5e2d$0$1612$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <579e19e0$0$1595$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <7f3efb38-e146-436d-b38e-a0e56427f7dc@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="588f0882a92c7a33a002b484e1c00683"; logging-data="32732"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18veSdbZ0fGzMjIu8Hfe2tg" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XxrIZdMJT7K/D3Ey/Tz+488jBWc= sha1:pK/Ys/t+Z3pM3hMEgrEj9wNH3+w= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:112160 Chris Angelico writes: > Yes, and we didn't have Python then. When I had a computer with 640KB > of memory, my options were (1) BASIC or (2) 8086 assembly language, > using DEBUG.EXE and its mini-assembler. Later on (much much later), I > added C to the available languages, but it was tedious and annoying, > because one tiny change meant minutes of compilation. 1. check this out: http://prog21.dadgum.com/116.html 2. There were also some decent Lisps for the PC. Sort of like Python but with parentheses as structure instead of indentation: http://norvig.com/python-lisp.html