Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marko Rauhamaa Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: proposed syntax for multiline anony-functions (hopefully?) Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:27:08 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 21 Message-ID: <871tsajiqb.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> References: <1bd05b41-ad00-4ce8-8678-de51205ebc3b@googlegroups.com> <913e5a30-f89b-4e94-afb4-b3d302ed44ac@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ff5cf27ef3d5b31f034d3b72bdc27a41"; logging-data="2860"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Wic0Qj5BNd1pkbX3MEtPQ" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:uMoEbuBokOXjq7bnbdBXqHn+l0M= sha1:gPuL3eSXPYMBl5Zp7m/mE0hdZ1w= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:76726 icefapper@gmail.com: > it is simply a matter of convenience: > > def a(): > print( "gvr" ) > func(a); > > or > > func( def(): > print("gvr") > ) > > it would be great if others could further share their opinions In practice, your proposal would not make life easier for Python programmers. Marko