Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Missing stack frames?
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 10:52:45 -0700
Organization: Nightsong/Fort GNOX
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <7xppiolfyq.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com>
References: <87fvjlv22v.fsf@vostro.rath.org> <CAPTjJmqzgZnziz3+yZb-4bsYtfxT2AG5HQ9Pb3Ya8AWDW8+oHA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.10709.1401903532.18130.python-list@python.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="8ff39c3b56f8fea9a226ae9d8294e48e"; logging-data="14160"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/0Szqq9cqwqJpyirOZiLKU"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uJip1us+iSVJHI+Wu5lXtFT7ueM= sha1:wbl3E2CZoZ2BrtuHlx154wM1zOo=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:72650

Nikolaus Rath <Nikolaus@rath.org> writes:
> Is there a way to produce a stacktrace without using the interactive
> debugger?

Yes, use the traceback module.