Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Newsgroups: comp.lang.python Subject: Re: Meaning and purpose of the Subject field Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 13:26:08 +0100 Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Lines: 17 Message-ID: <69090020.F6ufQZatfT@PointedEars.de> References: <567887f2$0$1606$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20151222033622.GA67382@cskk.homeip.net> Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Trace: solani.org 1450787168 2936 eJwNycEBgDAIA8CVSiAB1rHI/iPofY8u080QFVwudtBvoefUXPODJRimh4yK6pj8LxejvL4fCYYQWQ== (22 Dec 2015 12:26:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 12:26:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2 X-User-ID: eJwNysEBwCAIA8CVQEKUcQBl/xHae58blb1BJ3x8Dt95Fj3aNwLQlTdRC8xsQp4UYeVLl27JpB75U0y611z7AE6PFRk= Cancel-Lock: sha1:WEQbpZCK5o49oV34F/We+z5A49o= X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwNx8EBwCAIA8CViCFUxhEL+4/Q3u/EQNzHQ+Eaje122q5hv1hg1mkYVfobBrtNcCkSeRbyAwocD/E= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:100725 Random832 wrote: > This makes sense for the change from "old" to "new (was: old)", > which nobody was advocating against (after all, there's semantic > content - they wouldn't have changed the subject line if they > didn't consider it a new discussion topic), but I think there is > a reasonable argument that changing it a second time from > "new (was: old)" to "new" is frivolous. Nonsense. It is complete nonsense to carry around the old Subject for the rest of the thread. -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.