Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: Ignore error with non-zero exit status
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:27:54 +0100
Organization: PointedEars Software (PES)
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <6452640.DtIUyGyQXD@PointedEars.de>
References: <mailman.4.1450632635.2237.python-list@python.org> <3883651.fOIMIIEhYO@PointedEars.de> <mailman.7.1450648598.2237.python-list@python.org> <2062582.Z8LLNUJk5W@PointedEars.de> <mailman.10.1450652970.2237.python-list@python.org> <2721557.Hpeo4xmTem@PointedEars.de> <mailman.25.1450702711.2237.python-list@python.org> <2726691.rQGQ7FqzaZ@PointedEars.de> <mailman.26.1450704200.2237.python-list@python.org> <2827307.1DEaE21uzt@PointedEars.de> <mailman.29.1450707097.2237.python-list@python.org> <4322502.fjrUL15KNH@PointedEars.de> <mailman.32.1450715433.2237.python-list@python.org>
Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit
X-Trace: solani.org 1450736874 21380 eJwFwQkBACAIA8BK8g0XRwT7R/AuDIKbjoDHi7cJyrM18NRgn31796qT063wqdIyiiRIlnwWuRDo (21 Dec 2015 22:27:54 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 22:27:54 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.14.2
X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLTSE8cigD/xJ2RzFYuxpNudwAPiTL0e0X10L0vKwBs3B8vafHIvOTeeTT0burUe31ID853BVl
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jFzO0llghBaUAw0wjQ6k3C+vdbQ=
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: eJwFwYEBgDAIA7CXKNDqzmEI/59gwhDUT4pKLvc04HdqtDOq/kBaIydjbQeS57LitLfFfX8wnBGA
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:100700

Random832 wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn writes:
>> Chris Angelico wrote:
> CA>>>> Proof that percent formatting isn't planned for deprecation, much
> less CA>>>> removal.
> TL>>> Then it would have failed to accomplish that.
> CA>>>> There is strong support for it in certain quarters of python-dev.
> […]
> TL>>> There *was*.  The referred thread is from 2012-02.  It is 2015-12.
> CA>> Then show some evidence that python-dev has changed in viewpoint.
> TL> And why would I do that?  I have claimed no such thing.
> 
> Yes, you have.  Your claim that evidence from 2012 is no longer
> relevant is an implicit claim of precisely that.

No, it is not.  Your logic is flawed, too, pseudonymous nobody with the 
unreadable posting style.

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.