Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Marco Buttu <marco.buttu@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Subject: Re: class-private names and the Zen of Python
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 13:15:17 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <5253E945.5030608@gmail.com>
References: <l30lsq$tfd$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mailman.849.1381230484.18130.python-list@python.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: yLEXU8HhfLiiXyuXjVRTFQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:56388

On 10/08/2013 01:07 PM, Ned Batchelder wrote:

> On 10/8/13 6:13 AM, Marco Buttu wrote:
>>
>> >>> class Foo:
>> ...     _Foo__a = 100
>> ...     __a = 33
>> ...
>> >>> Foo._Foo__a
>> 33
>>
...
> You also get a "problem" if you do this:
>
>      >>> class Foo:
>     ...     a = 100
>     ...     a = 33
>     ...
>      >>> Foo.a
>     33

But this does not happen under the hood, it is explicit

> Also, as Terry mentions, no one has ever assigned the two names you
> show,

Sincerely, I can not now if someone has assigned (or will assegne) in 
such way...

-- 
Marco Buttu