Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <12344088.tLP8bKVGp5@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 04:06:08 +0200 User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Face: %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&. <1dfacec7-f101-4206-9f97-745739c62c91@y1g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <5029bf3b$0$29978$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <1726797.uF9SroCjta@PointedEars.de> Followup-To: poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 42 NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Aug 2012 04:06:09 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 689e429d.newsspool1.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=mZhm1iD]F?JA@P]\Dic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRAnkgeX?EC@@@1CEWAg0_HNEDZm8W4\YJNLR=i2=[N6Y6JmW]Sjjk5]WNVXWncAGao?I X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:27068 Chris Angelico wrote: > Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Probably you were asked that so that your postings could be distinguished >> from that of the other potential Marks around here. > > I have my surname in my From address, but I tend to sign my posts > "ChrisA" (no relation, btw, to DaveA, though our surnames are > similar). That's generally been sufficient for distinguishing > purposes, though if anyone wants a truly unique handle for me, > "Rosuav" is more effective than my real name. For one to read your signature, one has to download and read your entire posting first. >> Some people, including me, also consider posting under real name a basic >> act of politeness... Please use `[...]' or `[…]' to indicate omission instead. I could have written `politeness...' myself. >> People tend to hide behind pseudo-anonymity; they tend to write impolite >> things *intentionally* which they would not do if their real name was >> known and so their reputation IRL would be at stake. > > Agreed. Sometimes that's a good thing; there are places where > anonymity protection is important. But with these sorts of lists, > there's the potential to acquire a strong positive or strong negative > reputation; people who want a positive reputation usually want it > associated with *them*, not with some pseudonym. ACK. > Though I'm now not so sure about your name, PointedEars. Are you a > Vulcan or an elf? That is a stupid question. -- F'up2 PointedEars Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.