X-Received: by 10.236.124.100 with SMTP id w64mr922634yhh.57.1401344087368; Wed, 28 May 2014 23:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.91.245 with SMTP id z108mr4388qgd.16.1401344087062; Wed, 28 May 2014 23:14:47 -0700 (PDT)
Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!c1no19701697igq.0!news-out.google.com!qf4ni17234igc.0!nntp.google.com!c1no19701690igq.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 23:14:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.10420.1401308625.18130.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:120b:2c6f:21f0:81ac:a51d:678e:5bd0; posting-account=ung4FAoAAAC46zhHJ0Nsnuox7M5gDvs_
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:120b:2c6f:21f0:81ac:a51d:678e:5bd0
References: <mailman.10416.1401304999.18130.python-list@python.org> <7xha49wumw.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <CACwCsY5TTkgH1KNdToXd527weJBNxq_rTBwWvtKV-ngB6iUoaA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.10420.1401308625.18130.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <06a5fce6-90f3-46c7-9b6f-101fadc9fc4e@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Python 3 is killing Python
From: wxjmfauth@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 06:14:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.python:72221

Le mercredi 28 mai 2014 22:24:15 UTC+2, Mark Lawrence a =E9crit=A0:
> On 28/05/2014 20:58, Larry Martell wrote:
>=20
> > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid
>=20
> > <mailto:no.email@nospam.invalid>> wrote:
>=20
> >
>=20
> >     Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com
>=20
> >     <mailto:larry.martell@gmail.com>> writes:
>=20
> >      > Somthing I came across in my travels through the ether:
>=20
> >      > [1]https://medium.com/@deliciousrobots/5d2ad703365d/
>=20
> >
>=20
> >     "Python 3 can revive Python" https://medium.com/p/2a7af4788b10
>=20
> >        long HN comment thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3D7=
801834
>=20
> >
>=20
> >     "Python 3 is fine" http://sealedabstract.com/rants/python-3-is-fine=
/
>=20
> >
>=20
> >     OT: wow that medium site is obnoxious.
>=20
> >
>=20
> >
>=20
> > No company that I work for is using python 3 - they just have too much
>=20
> > of an investment in a python 2 code base to switch. I'm just saying.
>=20
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
> So you're happy because you've support until at least 2020, and the=20
>=20
> people using Python 3 are happy, mainly because of the vastly improved=20
>=20
> unicode handling via the FSR and asyncio in 3.4.  Presumably the only=20
>=20
> unhappy people are those who keep bleating on about forking Python to=20
>=20
> produce a 2.8, or has work on this already started without my knowledge?
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --=20
>=20
> My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask=20
>=20
> what you can do for our language.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> Mark Lawrence
>=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

Unicode: a reason to not use Python.

jmf