Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder7.news.weretis.net!border2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 12:31:20 -0500 From: ken Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: errors in ghostscript 9.51, but OK with ghostscript 9.50 Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2020 18:31:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5eda75b1$0$13641$e4fe514c@newszilla.xs4all.nl> Reply-To: ken@spamcop.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 200603-2, 03/06/2020), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 29 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com X-Trace: sv3-kYexevdrtOE/T3dOckPEYR0ju2lvAII03GiUkc0eL5yIzEPzA0IE7w4ouBw8sUJ/lPWr1PCrR7n0oF3!ds3TY+C1ERB7SlSiuJLvsQInlArqa7S2siHcUgEeh7pecgIrfW5yFj7ddsJYtRWMIZEQHxXINs1j!amQzXV7lfiNtcwA= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2141 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.postscript:3543 In article <5eda75b1$0$13641$e4fe514c@newszilla.xs4all.nl>, luuk@invalid.lan says... > >> well, I have located the problem. It triggered by a EPS file. After run > >> eps2eps on the EPS, now ghostscript 9.51 does not give any error message. > >> > >> I just wonder if it's a bug of ghostscript? After all, 9.50 could live > >> with the file, and 9.51 could not. > > > > Again, without seeing the file, there's no possible way to tell. It > > could equally well be that there was something wrong which was > > previously ignored, and now is not. > > > > > > Ken > > > > Comparing the eps file before, and after the eps2eps should (or could?) give a clue. After its been through eps2write (or even epswrite if the version is old enough) ? Nope. The output EPS will be utterly different from the input EPS. Ken