Path: csiph.com!aioe.org!P703Hxu1m1uplaQVJzdzug.user.46.165.242.75.POSTED!not-for-mail From: news@zzo38computer.org.invalid Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript Subject: Re: PC Encoding (why some doesn't work?) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 09:15:16 -0700 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: <1627574054.bystand@zzo38computer.org> References: <1627514187.bystand@zzo38computer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Info: gioia.aioe.org; logging-data="30585"; posting-host="P703Hxu1m1uplaQVJzdzug.user.gioia.aioe.org"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@aioe.org"; User-Agent: bystand/1.2.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.postscript:3655 ken wrote: > Have you checked the font to see if it contains glyph descriptiosn > identified with those names ? It look like it doesn't include these names. (All of the other glyphs I specified in the PCEncoding are working, though.) > Since these are unusual glyphs, almost certainly the font doesn't > contain them. Would you be able to tell me then what is the proper glyph names for PC Encoding? If they are the glyphs that this font does not include, which font does have it, and does Ghostscript include it? (And if not, should Ghostscript include it?) -- Don't laugh at the moon when it is day time in France.