Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.pascal.misc > #925
| From | Ramine <ramine@1.1> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.pascal.misc |
| Subject | My final words... |
| Date | 2014-06-14 17:59 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <lnir5n$o7h$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello... Here is my final words about my scalable RWLocks... So you have noticed with me that to scale my scalable RWLocks you have to use a distributed memory configuration like in NUMA systems, and on the reader and writer part of my scalable RWLocks you have to use more expensive processing, that means you have to transfer data in parallel from the distributed memory to the CPUs, cause this memory transfers from distributed memory to the cores is more expensive than the cache-line transfers from one core to the other that i am generating inside my sclable RWLocks algorithms, so this will make the parallel part much bigger than the serial part so this will make my scalable RWLocks algorithms much more scalable, and this is good, that's the same for hardisks, you have to distribute your hardisks , and use multiple hardisks an access them in parallel,this also will make my scalable RWLocks more scalable, and this is good. So as you have noticed my scalable RWLocks are still useful and good. Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.lang.pascal.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar
My final words... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2014-06-14 17:59 -0700
csiph-web