Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: aminer Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal.misc Subject: Here is the new scimark2 benchmarks: Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 05:48:17 -0700 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 42 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net hqhGVWUi/gpsxGaxkIiFpzOzOsoYzyY6ovy1wo/wSzfzLzqxf3YIcx4+l7VyBzXF+UPwzJTiZGqxUKKbFrYxTQ== NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 21:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="9c997QX03slWmKILOFz4WFT7c1zpeIGwTtnfW2Dtlsf1DvP8960EEzcgKqokvVuECeB1ikA4DxzljZoyMd+SRgIw0JPsShCabgR4aZ69xXukgMR11vdlD0gaPXoK1CYv"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:mc/jc6FhV5Cd83hq5Olcrv4Zg4g= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.pascal.misc:869 Hello, Here is the new scimark2 benchmarks: For 64-bit fpc 2.7.1 we have: Composite Score MFlops: 567.02 FFT Mflops: 340.34 (N=1024) SOR Mflops: 717.01 (100 x 100) MonteCarlo: Mflops: 113.77 Sparse matmult Mflops: 811.47 (N=1000, nz=5000) LU Mflops: 852.50 (M=100, N=100) For 64-bit TDM GCC 4.8.1 we have: Composite Score: 750.46 FFT Mflops: 664.98 (N=1024) SOR Mflops: 723.33 (100 x 100) MonteCarlo: Mflops: 225.10 Sparse matmult Mflops: 978.88 (N=1000, nz=5000) LU Mflops: 1160.01 (M=100, N=100) As you have noticed the GCC is only around 20% faster than FPC 2.7.1 on the Sparse matmult and LU and it has the same speed as FPC on the SOR, that's cool, and i think FPC will get more optimized in the near future, so i am not worry about the performance of FreePascal cause i am sure that FreePascal will get much better. You can download fpc 2.7.1 from here: ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/trunk/ Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.