Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.pascal.borland > #106
| From | Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.pascal.borland |
| Subject | Re: Prime Number Programming |
| Date | 2012-07-19 14:06 +0000 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <slrnk0g53v.28r9.marcov@toad.stack.nl> (permalink) |
| References | <a3e42bb6-c1d2-4db4-9f1e-243f33a004ef@googlegroups.com> |
On 2012-07-19, KBH <emptypost@hotmail.com> wrote: > Here is the subject: > > http://www.delphigroups.info/2/e9/3997-2.html No that is random url with a very long discussion. > And when I say that I have prime number code that does not have any > unnecessary operations I mean that all divisions are by prime numbers. > But then that poster does take a larger view and seems to say that overall > efficiency doesn't really matter. Isn't that more childish ? Well, of course performance doesn't matter, otherwise one would use an optimizing compiler and not an old 16-bit TP. > But I like the trial division prime number code even though I have moved > on to other code. Once the trial division was run one time then it had > prime numbers in memory array to use for the next runs. So it could get > faster in use but didn't have files of prime numbers that could be deleted I'm not sure what the question in this post is?
Back to comp.lang.pascal.borland | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Prime Number Programming KBH <emptypost@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-19 05:38 -0700 Re: Prime Number Programming Marco van de Voort <marcov@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-07-19 14:06 +0000 Re: Prime Number Programming emptypost@hotmail.com - 2012-07-19 17:15 -0700
csiph-web