Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.modula3
Subject: Re: Status of Modula-3
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2014 10:21:36 +0000
Organization: none
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <87fvds65e7.fsf@ixod.org>
References: <ljllcu$148$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="1b3e5cba9e4d07a53741e6f3d1717925"; logging-data="3777"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/4IMiiM1++a9/V29hzZpz6"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+KvW7Fh1Rgzf6sUl1ay4LpvahOk= sha1:b+u8qSQKaIBHIgWwlS6cvxgkSeQ=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.modula3:31

bruce axtens <bugmagnet@outlook.com> writes:

> I had a long and fruitful relationship with Modula-2. I haven't touched 
> it now for years. Modula-3 should be fairly easy to pick up, but is it 
> worth it? Is M3 "viable" in the sense that is there a living community of 
> users/developers?

To my considerable surprise I now notice commits on
https://github.com/modula3/cm3 in recent months.

-- Mark