Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: multi browser forms issue
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 23:38:28 +0100
Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <m2vcqqffob.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl>
References: <a9622d31-d06a-4886-8a6d-b90e8a1781ef@o19g2000vbk.googlegroups.com> <6b248eda-8b2d-4618-af26-d3983cdcdbb1@u10g2000prl.googlegroups.com> <m2y5vsnl21.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <858f3485-5cf5-41f1-b4be-e8619d3ac867@k38g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <m2mxc7mvs3.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <9716086.hkaJUJhadI@PointedEars.de> <m2ehxh14ww.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <1481913.n2Sy7kCIUo@PointedEars.de>
Reply-To: ebednarz@gmx.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: individual.net Yo0OywzLstAc5ZQnDK58MQEzxHwtbzs9udtiTq0B0jOWPXOFv8
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HMnFRG9th81eUMu3EzquzD3m7yA= sha1:CNleQgyHip5kaHXATytjz2REJ3w=
X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (darwin)
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.javascript:8245

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:

> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>
>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> writes:
>>> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>>>> David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> Eric Bednarz wrote:
>>>>>>>> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
>>>>>>> That's not right for HTML5.
>>>>>> There seem to be quite some things eluding you, too…
>>>>> Wrong. Once again, I am pointing out how silly it is to transplant an
>>>>> HTML5 doctype onto a document that is clearly not HTML5.
>>>> By making bullshit statements? Oh well. I guess you win :-)
>>> There are two ways to approach this problem.
>> 
>> Possibly. For me, however, there is but one. I comment exactly on what I
>> quote and call shenanigans when appropriate.
>
> Ignoring the context

Look who’s talking.

> of a statement and then attacking the person making the 
> statement (instead of the statement) on those grounds constitutes a number 
> of common fallacies.

I agree. So why do you do that?