Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #8363
| From | Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML |
| Date | 2011-11-16 02:29 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <j9v3l8$472$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <b8aaaf65-2095-4145-8992-651aae0e9a69@p9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <j9ulej$141$1@news.albasani.net> <2724045.nNXnhXx0nj@PointedEars.de> |
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn schrieb: > Andreas Bergmaier wrote: > >> Only because the native html parser is faster than the javascript >> interpreter? > > There is no "javascript" I know I should spell it "JavaScript", but when I'm writing English my shift key often stucks - sorry. You don't have to remind me of that, but thanks. > and you have a common misconception of how code > written in an ECMAScript implementation is being executed by a Web browser. I hope not, but isn't "interpreting code" a short form for "interpreting syntax, building a (implementation specific) native structure, and execute it when requested"? >> I could understand the use of innerHTML when it's for large static >> elements delivered as plain text per ajax - where the server can >> serialize the structure into HTML. > > What you are writing may read sophisticated and even meaningful to the > uninitiated, but it actually makes no sense at all. I strongly suggest you > familiarize yourself with the workings of Web server and browser – and > perhaps English – before making further (English-language) statements on > this topic. For example, the Web *server* does not (need to) serialize > anything if you use XHR to request HTML markup in the response message. No, you understood me right. A server has same structured data, for example in a database, which should be displayed on the client's screen. So either the server generates HTML markup, or it sends the data as some other type - e.g. json -, which could decrease the file size significantly. In the first case the script engine would use innerHTML, in the second it could either build the table with dom methods or serialize the data to a markup string and use innerHTML again. So which of the three ways is faster? Bergi
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2011-11-15 11:47 -0800
Re: David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2011-11-15 22:26 +0100
Re: David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2011-11-15 22:57 +0100
Re: David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2011-11-15 21:16 -0200
Re: David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-11-16 01:11 +0100
Re: David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2011-11-16 02:29 +0100
Re: David Mark's Javascript Daily - Volume #3 - Tip #6 - How to Get and Set HTML Dr J R Stockton <reply1146@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2011-11-16 18:51 +0000
csiph-web