Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <1585502.u0CSR6QjqH@PointedEars.de> From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Reply-To: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn Organization: PointedEars Software (PES) Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2011 02:43:54 +0200 User-Agent: KNode/4.4.11 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit Subject: Re: When do elements get their style attribute values? Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript References: <7b74185d-54dd-4680-b9e4-b0b5586709c1@h25g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <2976520.SPkdTlGXAF@PointedEars.de> <1640814.eSNOYOoDGQ@PointedEars.de> Followup-To: comp.lang.javascript MIME-Version: 1.0 Lines: 59 NNTP-Posting-Date: 17 Jul 2011 02:43:54 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: aca16235.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=HSSb[0\Wg[YAX0F2i> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >> Tim Streater wrote: >> > Don't be silly. >> Pot, kettle, black. > > Don't be silly. I am not going to repeat myself. >> > My question was clear and concise >> >> Obviously too concise, leading to guessing games. And it was asked in >> two places at once, which is reasonably frowned upon. > > If I don't get an answer in one place, I'll try another. Fair enough, in this case. >> > and contained all the necessary information >> >> No, it did not. You did not post the relevant "ajax calls", that in your >> opinion made the difference, for example. > > The ajax calls themselves are not relevant, Yes, they are. > except in so far as they provided a delay, as a considerable amount of > initialisation is done - but not of any element heights. […] You are still missing the point, even though it has been explained to you. >> I have nothing else to add to my initial statements. > > Good. I suggest you keep it that way. In fact, I'm not sure why you > chipped in at all. If you don't know the answer (and there's nothing > wrong with that), then keep quiet rather than starting a pointless > meta-discussion. You are way out of line, mister. >> F'up2 PointedEars > > Not they're not. Apparently not, as you have impolitely ignored my request to reply via e-mail only, too. Score adjusted PointedEars -- realism: HTML 4.01 Strict evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml -- Bjoern Hoehrmann