Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38713 > unrolled thread
| Started by | bursejan@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2019-01-27 08:16 -0800 |
| Last post | 2019-01-27 19:04 -0500 |
| Articles | 5 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
Current JDK landscape? bursejan@gmail.com - 2019-01-27 08:16 -0800
Re: Current JDK landscape? Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2019-01-27 20:28 +0100
Re: Current JDK landscape? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2019-01-27 23:56 +0000
Re: Current JDK landscape? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-01-27 19:07 -0500
Re: Current JDK landscape? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2019-01-27 19:04 -0500
| From | bursejan@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 08:16 -0800 |
| Subject | Current JDK landscape? |
| Message-ID | <deef4b27-f0dd-4480-9dc7-7f597d6974b1@googlegroups.com> |
Anybody experience with: #LibericaJDK https://www.bell-sw.com/java.html ?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Silvio <silvio@internet.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 20:28 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <5c4e067a$0$10625$e4fe514c@newszilla.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #38713 |
On 27-01-19 17:16, bursejan@gmail.com wrote: > Anybody experience with: > > #LibericaJDK > https://www.bell-sw.com/java.html ? > Why does this even exist? I don't see the point.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 23:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <q2lgg9$8hf$1@news.albasani.net> |
| In reply to | #38714 |
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:28:58 +0100, Silvio wrote: > On 27-01-19 17:16, bursejan@gmail.com wrote: >> Anybody experience with: >> >> #LibericaJDK https://www.bell-sw.com/java.html ? >> >> > Why does this even exist? I don't see the point. With the (lack of) information and links to descriptive pages on its download page I'm unable to decide if it has a point. If its download page described what it does, e.g. Javadocs for the packages/classes it supplies and what problems they are meant to solve, that would be a lot more helpful than simply stating that its 'for Docker'. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 19:07 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q2lh4p$4c2$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #38715 |
On 1/27/2019 6:56 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 20:28:58 +0100, Silvio wrote: > >> On 27-01-19 17:16, bursejan@gmail.com wrote: >>> Anybody experience with: >>> >>> #LibericaJDK https://www.bell-sw.com/java.html ? >>> >>> >> Why does this even exist? I don't see the point. > > With the (lack of) information and links to descriptive pages on its > download page I'm unable to decide if it has a point. > > If its download page described what it does, e.g. Javadocs for the > packages/classes it supplies and what problems they are meant to solve, This OpenJDK build probably solve the same problems as other OpenJDK builds. > that would be a lot more helpful than simply stating that its 'for > Docker'. It is available in many forms including Docker, but also MSI, ZIP, DMG, DEB and TAR.GZ. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2019-01-27 19:04 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <q2lgv5$4c2$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
| In reply to | #38714 |
On 1/27/2019 2:28 PM, Silvio wrote: > On 27-01-19 17:16, bursejan@gmail.com wrote: >> Anybody experience with: >> >> #LibericaJDK >> https://www.bell-sw.com/java.html ? > > Why does this even exist? I don't see the point. Yet another company doing a JDK build and selling support for it. If they can get customers then it is good for them. I think it is good for Java as sucj that you can get OpenJDK builds from so many sources. Arne
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web