Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11026 > unrolled thread

?? @revised Tag ??

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

Contents

  ?? @revised Tag ?? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-12-29 17:44 +0100
    Re: ?? @revised Tag ?? markspace <-@.> - 2011-12-29 10:39 -0800
    Re: ?? @revised Tag ?? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-29 21:19 -0800
      Re: ?? @revised Tag ?? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-12-30 06:55 -0400

#11026 — ?? @revised Tag ??

Dear All,

Just noticed a @revised Tag in some JDK 1.7 source code:

      * @revised 6.0
      */
     public static boolean interrupted() {
         return currentThread().isInterrupted(true);
     }

Its kind of unusual since it does not say @revised 1.6
but rather @revised 6.0? Any information on this tag?
What is the quickest way to lookup the revision content?

Bye

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#11027

On 12/29/2011 8:44 AM, Jan Burse wrote:

> What is the quickest way to lookup the revision content?


Google it.

I didn't recognize that tag so I Googled for the Javadoc documentation. 
  I don't see the tag listed there.  Then I Googled for the actual 
documentation for /interrupted()/, and I don't see any revision note 
there either.

My guess: somebody made a mistake and used a bogus tag.  Or Oracle has 
some internal tool that looks for @revised tags, but it's not part of 
their public tool set.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#11028

On Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:44:10 AM UTC-8, Jan Burse wrote:
> Dear All,
> 
> Just noticed a @revised Tag in some JDK 1.7 source code:
> 
>       * @revised 6.0
>       */
>      public static boolean interrupted() {
>          return currentThread().isInterrupted(true);
>      }
> 
> Its kind of unusual since it does not say @revised 1.6
> but rather @revised 6.0?

That doesn't seem unusual at all, since it's Java version 6.0.
http://java.sun.com/javase/namechange.html
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/relnotes/version-5.0.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_version_history#J2SE_5.0_.28September_30.2C_2004.29
This numbering scheme has been in use since September, 2004.

-- 
Lew

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#11032

On 11-12-30 01:19 AM, Lew wrote:
> On Thursday, December 29, 2011 8:44:10 AM UTC-8, Jan Burse wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Just noticed a @revised Tag in some JDK 1.7 source code:
>>
>>       * @revised 6.0
>>       */
>>      public static boolean interrupted() {
>>          return currentThread().isInterrupted(true);
>>      }
>>
>> Its kind of unusual since it does not say @revised 1.6
>> but rather @revised 6.0?
> 
> That doesn't seem unusual at all, since it's Java version 6.0.
> http://java.sun.com/javase/namechange.html
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/relnotes/version-5.0.html
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_version_history#J2SE_5.0_.28September_30.2C_2004.29
> This numbering scheme has been in use since September, 2004.
> 
Or like the docs said, there are two versions - a product or marketing
version (5 or 6 or 7), and a developer version (1.5, 1.6, 1.7), with
accompanying notation for specifying updates.

Down in Javadocs I wouldn't expect to see the marketing version, but I'd
understand it.

AHS
-- 
...wherever the people are well informed they can be trusted with their
own government...
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1789

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web