Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12241

Re: Hairy generics question

From Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Hairy generics question
References <3c65271e-a388-49c9-bcc6-ca3bf274e74f@e27g2000vbu.googlegroups.com>
Message-ID <v2Y0r.9874$yb.2452@newsfe20.iad> (permalink)
Date 2012-02-21 18:04 -0800

Show all headers | View raw


On 2/21/12 6:30 AM, sclaflin wrote:
> I have a number of sets of matched parameterized classes: a bean, a
> presenter, and a view.
> The presenters and views have parallel inheritance hierarchies (where
> T is the bean type, P the presenter type, and V is the view type):
>
> public class CompA extends CompItem<AInfo, CompA, CompAView>
> public class CompB extends CompItem<BInfo, CompB, CompBView>
>
> public class CompAView extends CompItemView<AInfo, CompA, CompAView>
> public class CompBView extends CompItemView<BInfo, CompB, CompBView>
>
> public class CompItemView<T extends CompItemInfo,
>                               P extends AbstractCompItem<T, P, V>,
>                               V  extends CompItemViewInterface<T, P,
> V>>
>    extends AbstractCompItemView<T, P, V>
>    implements CompItemViewInterface<T, P, V>
>
> public abstract class CompItem<T extends CompItemInfo,
>                                    P extends AbstractCompItem<T, P, V>,
>                                    V extends CompItemViewInterface<T,
> P, V>>
>    extends AbstractCompItem<T, P, V>
>    implements CompWidget<T>
>
> Many of the views are the same, so I wanted to just use the base view
> class instead of creating a separate view class for each presenter.
> So I tried:
>
> public class CompA extends CompItem<AInfo, CompA, CompItemView>
>
> But I get an error that says "The type CompItemView is not a valid
> substitute for the bounded parameter<V extends
> CompItemViewInterface<T,P,V>>  of the type CompItem<T,P,V>.
> Why can I use a class that extends CompItemView for the V type, and
> not CompItemView itself?

I'll try to propose a way to fix your type declarations, but then I'll 
make a better suggestion, please read through ;-)

I think what you'll need to do is have generic parameter to CompA:

public class CompA<View extends CompItemViewInterface<AInfo, 
CompA<View>, View>> extends CompItem<AInfo, CompA<View>, View>

The better suggestion that I have for you is to try to find a better way 
of handling this generic-type interdependency.  I once wrote something 
very similar, and it is a headache to maintain. Especially when I needed 
to add in (I'm making up names to match your example) CompItemAccessor. 
And then later CompItemValidator. And so on. I eventually ended up with 
one class ContentTypeMetadata<X,Y,Z,A,B,C> which contained all the basic 
information for each content type, and the class types didn't really 
have to know much about each other.

Ask yourself, do all these objects really need to know the exact type of 
all the other objects, or can they just know about some shared base 
interface?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Hairy generics question sclaflin <steve@steveclaflin.com> - 2012-02-21 06:30 -0800
  Re: Hairy generics question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-21 09:24 -0800
  Re: Hairy generics question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-02-21 11:05 -0800
    Re: Hairy generics question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-21 12:09 -0800
  Re: Hairy generics question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-21 18:04 -0800
    Re: Hairy generics question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-21 18:31 -0800
    Re: Hairy generics question Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2012-02-22 08:31 +0000
  Re: Hairy generics question sclaflin@webucator.com - 2012-02-24 11:12 -0800
    Re: Hairy generics question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-24 12:03 -0800
      Re: Hairy generics question sclaflin@webucator.com - 2012-02-24 14:07 -0800
        Re: Hairy generics question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-24 15:36 -0800
          Re: Hairy generics question sclaflin@webucator.com - 2012-02-25 10:27 -0800
          Re: Hairy generics question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-26 13:13 -0400
            What is Model View Presenter. (Was: Hairy generics question) Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-26 10:22 -0800
              Re: What is Model View Presenter. (Was: Hairy generics question) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-26 13:08 -0800
                Re: What is Model View Presenter. (Was: Hairy generics question) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-02-26 18:17 -0500
                Re: What is Model View Presenter. (Was: Hairy generics question) sclaflin@webucator.com - 2012-02-28 06:22 -0800
            Re: Hairy generics question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-28 09:46 -0800
              Re: Hairy generics question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-02-28 09:49 -0800
              Re: Hairy generics question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-28 12:45 -0800
              Re: Hairy generics question Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-02-29 19:37 -0400
                Re: Hairy generics question Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-02-29 22:32 -0800

csiph-web