Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Passing a Method Name to a Method, Redux
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 19:42:18 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v0u7075lmbu8u87fsbumau5blrln9vac2a@4ax.com>
References: <fpg7079ca2dtgipdphr8rm234kgmkd1t3l@4ax.com> <iu0m3c$glc$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7Qrvczazr82YckO5XW8Vtw"; logging-data="22870"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18K+t/Zsp3QIWmPJOreC305AQ8rFvjyAB0="
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
Cancel-Lock: sha1:HAQQFBHIorISfbTo6U3i+YuXeTY=
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5623

On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:34:50 -0700, markspace <-@.> wrote:

>On 6/23/2011 4:03 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
>> search.  The times for sequential searching are only a bit worse than
>> for binary searching.  Treeset searching is about 20% faster.  Any
>> explanations?
>
>
>Why does your TreeSetSearch() call SequentialSearch?  Doesn't that 

     I goofed.

>defeat the purpose of your timing comparisons?  I'm also not following 
>the parsing you are doing at all.  What is the goal of that method?

     I am parsing for identifiers.  In this test, I just throw them
away.
    
[snip]

>Odd call indicated above.  Doesn't that just do the exact same thing 
>that TreesetSearch does?

     Cut and paste did me in.  Thank you for catching this.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko