Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed01.chello.at!newscore.univie.ac.at!aconews-feed.univie.ac.at!aconews.univie.ac.at!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer From: Andreas Leitgeb Subject: Re: Style Police (a rant) References: <4e6c0fce$0$310$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <4e6d1fc5$0$308$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Reply-To: avl@logic.at User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: 15 Sep 2011 10:06:41 GMT Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at X-Trace: 1316081201 tunews.univie.ac.at 11354 128.130.175.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tuwien.ac.at Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8050 Eric Sosman wrote: > So if you want to produce software cost-effectively, it follows > that you *must* re-use existing code. Yeah, every single character of my sources has surely been used somewhere else, already. PS: And once I no longer find a job in software development, I'll try to get the job shovelling coal into furnaces of machines that produce the hot air which is then going to be (re)used by others' talking.