Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!newscore.univie.ac.at!aconews-feed.univie.ac.at!aconews.univie.ac.at!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
From: Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
Subject: Re: Arithmetic overflow checking
References: <015aeb15-57db-48ab-9cd4-77f8448b632f@w24g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> <2rydnez7l-H5BYnTnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <ivoiap$gru$1@dont-email.me> <drmdnTkz1raR1b3TnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <ivr43p$7cq$1@dont-email.me> <4e278a67$0$309$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1SSVp.69032$_I7.18660@newsfe08.iad> <j08v14$brk$1@speranza.aioe.org> <slrnj2g735.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <4e2892f1$0$309$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <heOdnWF5kt-7MrXTnZ2dnUVZ_u2dnZ2d@earthlink.com> <slrnj2jd39.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <1f3f067f-1753-4f6b-876d-19f92059d9b8@e20g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <slrnj2k168.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <qfadnTTv37FXkbfTnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
Reply-To: avl@logic.at
User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <slrnj2mak5.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
Date: 23 Jul 2011 20:09:41 GMT
Lines: 26
NNTP-Posting-Host: gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at
X-Trace: 1311451781 tunews.univie.ac.at 73248 128.130.175.3
X-Complaints-To: abuse@tuwien.ac.at
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6477

Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> wrote:
> On 7/22/2011 4:16 PM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote:
>> lewbloch<lewbloch@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> On Jul 22, 10:33 am, Andreas Leitgeb<a...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Patricia Shanahan<p...@acm.org>  wrote:
>>>> [about lack of operator overloading for non-primitive arithmetic types]
>>>>> The problem is not just the keystrokes for typing the expressions.
>>>>> It is very important to be able to check that a lengthy expression
>>>>> in a program is a correct translation of the corresponding expression,
>>>>> in mathematical notation, in a textbook or paper.
>>>> Lew?
>>> Yes?
>> So here are arguments (admittedly not mine) that include ("... not just...")
>> but also go beyond the complaint about the number of keystrokes. I was just
>> wondering, if you had any expert-opinion about them, that you'd care to share.
> Some of the context has been dropped in editing. My remarks were
> specific to the complex, in every sense of the word, expressions I've
> seen in scientific and engineering programs.

You meant only complex expressions on complex numbers?  (Is that every sense
of "complex", or did I even miss some more?)
If so, then sorry, I obviously understood your remarks as more general than they
were.  It's not my intention to misquote contexts and all that. I apologize
if it happened.