Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!texta.sil.at!newscore.univie.ac.at!aconews-feed.univie.ac.at!aconews.univie.ac.at!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer From: Andreas Leitgeb Subject: Re: Arithmetic overflow checking References: <015aeb15-57db-48ab-9cd4-77f8448b632f@w24g2000yqw.googlegroups.com> <2rydnez7l-H5BYnTnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <4e278a67$0$309$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1SSVp.69032$_I7.18660@newsfe08.iad> <4e2892f1$0$309$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1f3f067f-1753-4f6b-876d-19f92059d9b8@e20g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Reply-To: avl@logic.at User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Date: 22 Jul 2011 23:16:24 GMT Lines: 16 NNTP-Posting-Host: gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at X-Trace: 1311376584 tunews.univie.ac.at 73248 128.130.175.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tuwien.ac.at Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6435 lewbloch wrote: > On Jul 22, 10:33 am, Andreas Leitgeb > wrote: >> Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> [about lack of operator overloading for non-primitive arithmetic types] >>> The problem is not just the keystrokes for typing the expressions. >>> It is very important to be able to check that a lengthy expression >>> in a program is a correct translation of the corresponding expression, >>> in mathematical notation, in a textbook or paper. >> Lew? > Yes? So here are arguments (admittedly not mine) that include ("... not just...") but also go beyond the complaint about the number of keystrokes. I was just wondering, if you had any expert-opinion about them, that you'd care to share.