Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!newscore.univie.ac.at!aconews-feed.univie.ac.at!aconews.univie.ac.at!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer From: Andreas Leitgeb Subject: Re: Call by Result References: <95e4uuF3cvU1@mid.individual.net> <8CtIp.4644$PA5.4578@newsfe01.iad> <4df5290c$0$49183$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> Reply-To: avl@logic.at User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: 16 Jun 2011 11:03:03 GMT Lines: 10 NNTP-Posting-Host: gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at X-Trace: 1308222183 tunews.univie.ac.at 5640 128.130.175.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tuwien.ac.at Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:5331 Michael Wojcik wrote: > In the Verona of functional languages, the ML family are the Montagues > to the LISP family's Capulets. Or something like that. :-) And to which of these two families is Prolog more related to? It does make lot of use of expression-matching like the MLs, but seems to be quite different, still. A distant cousin?