Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.visyn.net!visyn.net!texta.sil.at!newscore.univie.ac.at!aconews-feed.univie.ac.at!aconews.univie.ac.at!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer From: Andreas Leitgeb Subject: Re: =?UTF-8?Q?Android=E2=80=94Why?= Dalvik? References: Reply-To: avl@logic.at User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: Date: 31 May 2011 14:25:45 GMT Lines: 12 NNTP-Posting-Host: gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at X-Trace: 1306851945 tunews.univie.ac.at 60386 128.130.175.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tuwien.ac.at Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4795 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > In message , Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: >> The funny thing, is that Java when it came out, was supposed to >> solve all these differences by putting a virtual OS between the >> application and the OS, this way one writes to this one common >> virtual OS (the VM) and not have to worry about the different >> OS's below it. > Those who knew the history of previous attempts to do this sort of thing > could already predict why it wasn’t going to succeed. I wouldn't exactly call "one size fits *almost* all" a failure.