Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!newscore.univie.ac.at!aconews-feed.univie.ac.at!aconews.univie.ac.at!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer From: Andreas Leitgeb Subject: Re: char to decimal References: <92ea64F3avU1@mid.individual.net> <9pednRnBeuxtPF_QnZ2dnUVZ_uGdnZ2d@earthlink.com> Reply-To: avl@logic.at User-Agent: slrn/pre0.9.9-111 (Linux) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: 06 May 2011 08:31:22 GMT Lines: 11 NNTP-Posting-Host: gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at X-Trace: 1304670682 tunews.univie.ac.at 60386 128.130.175.3 X-Complaints-To: abuse@tuwien.ac.at Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3649 Lew wrote: > On 05/05/2011 05:28 PM, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: >> Yep, these or even better 64 and 43 for true and false, just >> heaven forbid 1 and 0 - that's so ... boring simple, innit? > I do believe that as long as I'm using Java booleans, I'll stick with the > values 'true' and 'false'. That seems like the natural mapping to me. Oh, that must all be a big misunderstanding. I honestly never wanted to elide these two keywords. They would make excellent self-speaking integer-literals for particular uses. :-)