Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19487
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Jet optimising Compiler |
| Date | 2012-10-24 08:10 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <pq0g889ej5nkr9qut9apt24ms3vn11p8vo@4ax.com> (permalink) |
I use Jet to statically generate native Windows code from Java. The code loads quickly, can't be decompiled, and the machine code is astoundingly good, better than I could generate as an assembler programmer. It takes pipelining into consideration. I have never found a bug that did not turn out to be my fault. The only catch it is quite expensive. see http://mindprod.com/jgloss/jet.html However the people at Excelsior have decided to sell the standard version for $10 and give the money to charity to help kids in Russia with cancer. See details. http://www.excelsior-usa.com/jetcharity.html -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com There are four possible ways to poke a card into a slot. Nearly always, only one way works. To me that betrays a Fascist mentality, demanding customers conform to some arbitrary rule, and hassling them to discover the magic orientation. The polite way to do it is to design the reader slot so that all four ways work, or so that all the customer has to do is put the card in the vicinity of the reader.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Jet optimising Compiler Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-10-24 08:10 -0700
csiph-web