Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.mb-net.net!open-news-network.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Roedy Green Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: single instance Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 23:12:12 -0800 Organization: Canadian Mind Products Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <50e8eb1f$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Reply-To: Roedy Green NNTP-Posting-Host: K2Qzzs3EAqXk5RLzfhxcSw.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:21424 On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:51:45 -0800, Roedy Green wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > >I am puzzled about "227.228.229.230" the IP used. Where did that >value come from? Can this be made to work with IPV6? I discovered that 224.x.x.x - 239.x.x.x are reserved for IP multicast. I could pick a random number in the range, or is it ok that everyone uses the same IP or is it REQUIRED that everyone use the same IP -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com The first 90% of the code accounts for the first 90% of the development time. The remaining 10% of the code accounts for the other 90% of the development time. ~ Tom Cargill Ninety-ninety Law