Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jukka Lahtinen Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Who gets interviewed to produce use cases? Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:41:32 +0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ipa.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a5a3e65df26a45e8ef56e0325d9681f2"; logging-data="30483"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18HbvS07PC93LMlyTxlW7sF" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Mm+RaOc64qKmmvBTa9Mf+ZM0/Pw= sha1:DlEcTxh2t1cb+w4ufgXZHNXRAK0= X-no-archive: yes Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:17347 David Lamb writes: > Does anyone have data, or at least an informed opinion, on how often > genuine users of a proposed piece of software get consulted on developing > use cases (or some close equivalent)? I ask here because of the recent UML Not as often as they should. -- Jukka Lahtinen