Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder2.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder.ecngs.de!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.brightview.co.uk!news.brightview.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:19:05 -0500
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:19:05 +0100
From: bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110429 Fedora/2.0.14-1.fc13 SeaMonkey/2.0.14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: cropping images
References: <t77r47tvj51bpkie7a1s7jgc2f3bic6b5t@4ax.com> <pnbr47d5jav7vjt8abnnhmca8l2t5ndbdr@4ax.com> <j2melm$p1p$2@news.belwue.de> <02vt479b3tn44vf8eg0gm30158oi0vpkvn@4ax.com> <9bf1k8Fd0tU1@mid.individual.net> <dMqdnT6U4Jv5xs_TnZ2dnUVZ8l6dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <9bf6gcFi1tU1@mid.individual.net>
In-Reply-To: <9bf6gcFi1tU1@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <lJOdnaCv45v07s_TnZ2dnUVZ8rGdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Lines: 14
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace: sv3-1vPYkv8A8MIYcuREkuC0WZR/Z+uHrWUvkt2RvYnhyy4icNkHdfj8FcFIcsSRryERaspeA/5XFkAz/kE!tEQr2XH1dKzrFebobnHnfo8aaakmPWgpLzcSC18YR2S7Ucd/9xQYcJIFzp5iahrynri1zI278Ao8!K+rtk97fyLvwXAWEAjYwwgcNpQ==
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 1772
Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:7291

Nigel Wade wrote:

>
> Probably so. I've never used them. I tend to stick to GIMP and
> ImageMagick when I need to do image manipulation on Linux.

Me too, most of the time.

Netpbm is sometimes useful
on (very!) large images (compared to ImageMagick) because
ImageMagick not only holds the entire image in ram,
but does so in many bytes per sample way.

   BugBear