Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: what is the advantage of using maven for java standalone app
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 18:31:45 +0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <kkbtjs$o67$1@dont-email.me>
References: <9db463b7-fba0-46be-9390-4a144df49443@googlegroups.com> <kkbod5$jpj$1@dont-email.me> <00047d26-c262-4b60-be0c-9e75a3bfa56b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 15:29:00 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="013ed33460ef8057461d790794547ca1"; logging-data="24775"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+hbleaUUPupSBS/tc4wCBh"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17
In-Reply-To: <00047d26-c262-4b60-be0c-9e75a3bfa56b@googlegroups.com>
X-Face: "@)%Vlap6d%OVYDS}B4YUWE@yUy+^!w/+.q.,c5kjI#+uG?kYP&r/pTjNWgo:g[A,O=AL3/ j&4Le2cau$<e=FPq~GbeZ6DW1Grey[VHn8?ktzvoQtzlg;]&rh8g]CD+_BC7d[gW{Yx&_X*4Q$h&nJ l@t(|4R4:T='&]U#ui+z9OC$.~gJjU93kh:Ojc$Cz0n#I9!~!9ay?E<UlW&5,IFX1*KtA>MYEFst$y y"m]M7tq\S(>[a$x0x8%S
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tStty5Ts/ugAYlv539nkUTBgGDU=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:23443

Sat, 13 Apr 2013 08:14:45 -0700 (PDT), /mcheung63@gmail.com/:
> Stanimir Stamenkov於 2013年4月13日星期六UTC+8下午10時02分49秒寫道：
>> Sat, 13 Apr 2013 04:37:25 -0700 (PDT), /mcheung63@gmail.com/:
>>
>>>     I can feel the advantage of using maven to build webapp, please
>>> tell me what is the advantage of using maven for build standalone
>>> java app?
>>
>> Out of curiosity, what advantage do you feel about using Maven to
>> build a webapp?  Why your feeling doesn't apply for building a
>> standalone java app?
>
> advantage is , i can use husdon to do continue integration, this
> not very possible to a standalone app

Why do you think it is not possible to build a standalone app using 
a continuous integration server like Hudson - what's the difference? 
  Have you seen Eclipse which builds quite a lot of desktop 
components, uses Hudson too?

https://hudson.eclipse.org/

-- 
Stanimir