Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe07.iad.POSTED!00000000!not-for-mail
From: Thufir <hawat.thufir@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: no more primitive data types in Java (JDK 10+). What do you think?
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
References: <jmq71h$su0$1@speranza.aioe.org> <jmqvlg$r96$1@dont-email.me> <Ywakr.22899$Ex1.12284@newsfe18.iad>
User-Agent: Pan/0.133 (House of Butterflies)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <kk0969-od2.ln1@dur.bounceme.net>
Lines: 10
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.65.42.92
X-Complaints-To: internet.abuse@sjrb.ca
X-Trace: newsfe07.iad 1334956983 184.65.42.92 (Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:23:03 UTC)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 21:23:03 UTC
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 14:21:56 -0700
X-Received-Bytes: 1059
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:13716

On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 07:04:40 -0300, Arved Sandstrom wrote:

> But yes, we'd expect that you could do 5.someMethod(), for instance
> methods that make sense.


Which, in ruby, is an awesome feature.


-Thufir