Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Sosman Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: [OT] Re: polling IRQs in a thread's code Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:43:13 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 12:41:13 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0d73d8cc209bff1c6395088b400d0605"; logging-data="23393"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ruMvolSGBiV2r6xlYyKbp" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ah3q5+dOOXu8zWl6cWAMJpC2fV0= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:23114 On 3/25/2013 12:54 AM, markspace wrote: > [...] > Either way, throwing an exception seems much easier and > cleaner at the top level than manually breaking your code into discreet > sections. From http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discreet Definition of DISCREET 1 : having or showing discernment or good judgment in conduct and especially in speech : prudent; especially : capable of preserving prudent silence 2: unpretentious, modest 3: unobtrusive, unnoticeable See also http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrete Coming attractions: "loose" and "lose" ;-) -- Eric Sosman esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid