Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Lamb Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Mini-rant on Java REST (JAX-RS), JSON, XML, JAXB etc... Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:57:14 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <513197f8$0$80104$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <51340b53$0$32109$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 02:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="582e165532e9c292c654c5bbdca1358d"; logging-data="25151"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18bFfpoKRm2RkLAymOYaITw" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3 In-Reply-To: <51340b53$0$32109$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Cancel-Lock: sha1:3KijLk9eXvKTbkMc4RaKsi6a5UY= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:22704 On 03/03/2013 9:47 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 3/2/2013 1:11 AM, Kevin McMurtrie wrote: >> SOAP is one of the worst widely adopted protocols ever. It makes LDAP >> seem sensible. Just say "no." > > It works. That doesn't negate what Kevin said; it could "work", as in do useful stuff, while still being the worst widely adopted protocol. I don't know enough about SOAP to have a personal opinion, though.