Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.albasani.net!news.mixmin.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Twirlip of the Mists Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Java servlet on browsers: dying or kicking ? Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 22:10:38 -0500 Organization: Zamps Anonymous Message-ID: References: <50dbf6d1$0$80176$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <50dcfecc$0$292$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50dd5b51$0$80184$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <50de2260$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50df9c4b$0$284$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <2--dnSzM_qkbO3TNnZ2dnUVZ8nmdnZ2d@bt.com> <18001bb5-8400-4cc3-9078-6effbdf1c6fc@googlegroups.com> <3L2dncjwzq4CXXTNnZ2dnUVZ7vWdnZ2d@bt.com> <50ea2dd3$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50ea32c9$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <50ea3b5d$0$282$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2013 03:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.mixmin.net; posting-host="DRUQ1REDSqyK08GSkI35C0AeQ60"; logging-data="22387"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@mixmin.net" User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:21128 On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 22:04:59 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 1/6/2013 9:58 PM, Twirlip of the Mists wrote: >> On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:28:23 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> >>> On 1/6/2013 9:18 PM, Twirlip of the Mists wrote: >>>> On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:07:14 -0500, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 1/6/2013 1:21 PM, lipska the kat wrote: >>>>>> On 06/01/13 17:53, Lew wrote: >>>>>>> lipska the kat wrote: >>>>>>>> Arved Sandstrom wrote: >>>>>>>>> lipska the kat wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Richard Maher wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> "Arved Sandstrom" wrote >>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/29/2012 09:43 PM, Arne Vajh�j wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> [snip] >>>>>> >>>>>>> It's a conclusion based on the stated evidence. Your use of imprecise >>>>>>> language, >>>>>>> hand-waving and misstatement of others' points does not provide >>>>>>> evidence that >>>>>>> you are in a position, or possess the knowledge, to discuss the problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> And here we are again. >>>>>> >>>>>> In my many years of experience working in software teams using many >>>>>> different languages, methodologies and processes, >>>>> >>>>> Do you think anyone is impressed by posters that post >>>>> anonymously and claim experience? >>>> >>>> You mean, like you? (What's that you say? "Arne Vajhøj" is your real name? >>>> It's just as opaque an identification token to me as if you'd called >>>> yourself "Gurmax the Conqueror" or "User23125" -- you have exactly as much, >>>> or as little, reputation when I first see your newsposts. So I'd have had >>>> the same prior probability distribution regarding your techie expertise >>>> with any name you'd used. >>> >>> If you say so - I can not argue against you when it comes to how >>> you think. >>> >>> But most people have better information seeking skills. >> >> What the hell is that supposed to mean? >> >> That there's a bunch of stuff out there findable with Google saying "Arne >> Vajhøj is the bee's knees"? Why should I consider that especially credible? >> Or presume that someone posting to some newsgroup as "Arne Vajhøj" from a >> public NNTP server is the same Arne Vajhøj? First of all, it could be a >> fake. I could post from there as "Albert Einstein" and not magically be an >> expert on relativity physics, but hope to fool someone into thinking I was. >> Secondly, maybe "Arne Vajhøj" is the "John Smith" of your country and every >> third person there is named that. :) So there's no need to even assume bad >> faith. Oh, are you still a bit sore that I insinuated that maybe you might >> be someone trying to ride on someone else's reputation, before saying I >> don't actually think so? Well, that ought to make up for your insinuating >> that I have poor google-fu then. > > I think you just proved that. OK, it's obvious you have little else to offer tonight but childish name-calling. TTFN. -- Hexapodia is the key insight.