Path: csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!aioe.org!news.glorb.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!newsfe01.iad.POSTED!6b61fb94!not-for-mail From: Knute Johnson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: O/T: Tag lines, or sigs (Was: JNA performance) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 47 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsdemon.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 16:54:40 UTC Organization: NewsDemon Date: Sun, 08 May 2011 09:54:41 -0700 Xref: x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3817 On 05/08/2011 09:35 AM, Lew wrote: > Arved Sandstrom wrote: >> Lew wrote: >>> Qu0ll wrote: >>>> And loving it, >>>> >>>> -Qu0ll (Rare, not extinct) >>>> _________________________________________________ >>>> Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com >>>> [Replace the "SixFour" with numbers to email me] > >>> The convention for sigs, or tag lines, is to set them off with "dash >>> dash space", that is, "-- ", on its own line, and for the "cute" (in >>> one's own opinion) comments to follow that line. >>> >>> Most good news readers, and a few lamer ones such as what I use, >>> understand this convention and adjust the visual display of messages >>> accordingly. >>> >>> It also sets off stupid remarks like, "Honi soit qui mal y pense" or >>> "And loving it" so that they don't appear to be part of the actual >>> point. > >> Qu0ll's phrase always has me wondering whether he's paraphrasing >> McDonald's recent branding campaign, or he's old enough to have enjoyed >> Get Smart. :-) > > Maybe he's just young enough to have missed it by that much. > > Would you believe he's even younger than that and he found his parents' > old collection of paperback /Get Smart/ novelizations? > > No? Would you believe that he's an historian of classic American > television, and that he has sixteen researchers digging up citations as > we speak? > > How about four researchers and an overeager intern? > > One long-running Google query and far too much coffee? > :-) - because I'm old enough! -- Knute Johnson s/knute/nospam/