Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19618

Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one.

From	Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.programming
Subject	Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one.
Date	2012-11-04 14:14 +0100
Organization	University of Stuttgart, FRG
Message-ID	<k75pns$mm2$1@news2.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <0.73472d82415d5353822e.20121103155132GMT.87mwyyvg57.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <b227ba50-ccbc-4da0-9f6a-31bb809f329d@ah9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com> <0.898697c4e5f8819c7fa0.20121104004445GMT.878vaiurgi.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <87vcdllg3u.fsf@informatimago.com> <0.96b4857ea7d651ed53b3.20121104124839GMT.87txt5tty0.fsf@bsb.me.uk>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 04.11.2012 13:48, schrieb Ben Bacarisse:
> "Pascal J. Bourguignon"<pjb@informatimago.com>  writes:
> <snip>
>> Well, I don't know of any processor that uses a separate stack for the
>> frame pointers.
>
> No, me neither.  The description also lacked any mention of the return
> address so I don't think this is about hardware.  Maybe it's coursework,
> and the separate stacks are there to keep the concepts clear?  I don't
> know.

Didn't FORTH have the concept of separate stacks, one for passing 
arguments, and one for expression evaluation?

Thread

Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 07:45 -0700
  Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-03 15:51 +0000
    Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 09:22 -0700
      Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. markspace <-@.> - 2012-11-03 11:20 -0700
      Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-03 18:58 +0000
      Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 00:49 +0100
      Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-04 00:44 +0000
        Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 13:14 +0100
          Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-04 12:48 +0000
            Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2012-11-04 14:14 +0100
              Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-04 15:38 +0000
            Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 14:41 +0100
          Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2012-11-04 14:11 +0000
            Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-11-04 16:00 +0100
          Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. markspace <-@.> - 2012-11-04 11:02 -0800
          Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2012-11-04 19:56 +0000
    Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-03 16:46 -0400
      Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-04 08:22 -0500
        Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-04 11:30 -0500
          Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-04 19:40 -0500
  Re: Creating a new stack from an exisiting one. Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-11-03 16:02 -0700

csiph-web