Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!usenet.ukfsn.org!not-for-mail From: Martin Gregorie Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: demise of sun.com Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Organization: UK Free Software Network Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <80d858l76kch632v7gdefamcecl18a646t@4ax.com> <821958dsvuebbng74ded6o3g436al8iktj@4ax.com> <50844f52-8a95-4f16-8b31-26301c1497b6@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 84.45.235.129 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: localhost.localdomain 1348003741 32162 84.45.235.129 (18 Sep 2012 21:29:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@localhost.localdomain NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:01 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:18829 On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 13:21:35 -0700, Lew wrote: > Consider instead a search solution along the lines Martin mentioned for > RFCs. Links can still be maintained, according to a triage system of > need and benefit. But they need not be, given a search system that > elicits the same connections on demand. > > The search system complexity and deficiencies are completely independent > of the article base, and presumably bounded. > There is a small dependency. In systems like the RFC search each article has to unambiguously reference the one it is obsoleting and (probably) needs to share some common terms in the title or abstract: these represent a small burden on the author when the article is written but should need no maintenance thereafter. It should also be simple for the search system to automatically add a forward link to the article it obsoletes or extends when its added to the database. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |